Skip to content
Agency Pilot

SEO audits

AI search visibility for local businesses

Customers are asking AI assistants for "the best plumber in Medina". The AI Search Visibility audit checks whether ChatGPT and other assistants mention your client for their money queries, and which competitors they name instead.

AI assistants checked

ChatGPT and other AI answers, for up to five money keywords per audit.

Who they name instead

When the business isn't mentioned, you see which competitors are.

In keyword research too

Keyword lookups show whether ChatGPT and Gemini mention the topic.

In the reports

AI visibility is part of the Sales Report and the monthly Progress Report.

Priced in credits

The cost is shown before you run it; works on prospects and clients.

Tracked monthly

Schedule it and see visibility change as you work on the profile and site.

Why it matters for local businesses

AI answers tend to recommend businesses that are well reviewed, clearly described and mentioned across the web. A business that ranks in the map pack isn't automatically named by an assistant — and one that isn't may be losing enquiries it never sees.

The audit runs the business's money queries through AI assistants and records whether it's mentioned and who is. It's a starting point for the conversation about reviews, profile content, citations and site content that feed both local rankings and AI answers.

What this does not do

Better to find this out here than three weeks in.

  • AI answers vary between runs and users. Treat results as a sample, and compare month to month rather than reading one answer as final.
  • It's an audit you run or schedule, not a continuous tracker across every AI engine.

Questions

Which AI assistants are checked?
ChatGPT and other AI answers available through our search data provider. Keyword research also shows ChatGPT and Gemini mentions.
Can I improve AI visibility?
A complete profile, accurate citations and clear service pages give people and search systems better information. Compare repeated samples for the same queries, but do not treat a changed AI answer as proof that a particular edit caused it or as a guarantee of future mentions.

Put your agency on autopilot

Start a 14-day trial with 300 credits. Add your first client and send an onboarding link today.

Define what an AI search visibility audit should answer

AI search visibility is a question about whether a business appears in the answers sampled for relevant customer queries. Start with the business identity, service and location before selecting the phrases to check. A broad question about an industry and a specific request for a provider in a town can produce very different kinds of answers. The audit becomes more useful when the agency can explain which customer decision each query represents.

Agency Pilot's audit checks a limited set of money keywords and records whether the business is mentioned and which competitors appear. Treat those results as observations from the available audit sources. They do not represent every conversation, assistant, user location or wording someone might try. Establishing that scope at the beginning gives the client a fair basis for interpreting the report and prevents one answer from being mistaken for a complete market measurement.

Choose a small set of queries with a clear purpose

Use phrases that reflect the service the client actually provides and the location they want to serve. A hypothetical local plumbing business might want to understand discovery for emergency repairs separately from advice about maintaining a water heater. Those questions have different intents, so do not combine them without explanation. Ask the owner which enquiries are valuable and which work the company does not accept before finalizing the audit's query set.

A focused set is easier to compare over time. Keep the exact wording with your working notes and avoid changing every query between reports. If you add a new service or test a different phrasing, label it as an additional exploration. This helps the client distinguish a change in the sampled answer from a change in the question itself. The audit is a measurement exercise, so the question design is part of its evidence.

Distinguish a mention from a recommendation or citation

A business name appearing in an answer does not always mean the answer recommends it. The name could appear in a comparison, a caution, a list or a passing reference. Likewise, an answer may refer to information from a website without providing the kind of provider recommendation the client hoped to see. Read the context available in the result before summarizing what the mention means for the business.

Use precise language in the client conversation. Say that a sampled answer mentioned the business when that is what the evidence shows. Avoid upgrading that statement to a claim that the assistant prefers the client, that all users will see the same response or that a visit was generated. The audit can help identify visibility questions and named alternatives, while actual customer activity requires separate evidence from website visits, enquiries or recorded sales.

Compare named competitors as research leads

When another business appears, review whether it serves the same area and customer need. A familiar competitor may be relevant, but an answer can also name a directory, a distant provider or a business with a different specialty. Confirm the relationship before using the result to benchmark the client. The first practical question is whether the comparison itself makes sense for the service and location being discussed.

Look for verifiable differences in how the businesses describe their services and public information. Use that review to identify gaps in the client's own clarity or accuracy, without assuming that any visible difference caused the sampled answer. The report does not reveal the full decision process behind an assistant's response. A competitor mention should prompt careful investigation, not an automatic instruction to copy their page structure, claims or business details in pursuit of an identical outcome.

Review the information a customer can verify

Use an AI visibility review as a reason to check the client's public information for accuracy and clarity. Confirm that service pages describe real work, that locations and contact details are correct and that the business's identity is understandable across its public presence. These are useful customer-facing improvements even when their effect on a particular assistant's answer cannot be isolated.

Avoid adding invented credentials, exaggerated claims or repetitive text simply to influence a sampled result. Ask the client for genuine expertise, examples and explanations that help a prospective customer make a decision. If an audit reveals an inaccurate description of the business, investigate the public information and the specific result before choosing a response. The agency can improve material it controls and explain the observation, but should not promise control over how every external system interprets that material.

Make repeated audits comparable and affordable

A recurring audit can help the team observe whether the sampled answers change. Keep the core business identity and queries stable, note the observation dates and record meaningful changes to the client's public information. When results vary, describe the variation instead of forcing a simple success story. The existing feature is an audit you run or schedule, not continuous coverage of every AI engine and conversation.

Review the credit cost before running additional checks, and use extra runs for a defined investigative purpose. Repeating the same question until the business appears can create a misleading report if only the favorable result is shown. A better approach is to retain the relevant observations and explain their limits. Consistent methods make the report more useful for decisions, even when the answer is that the available sample is too variable to support a confident conclusion.

Place AI visibility beside local search and business outcomes

AI visibility can be one part of a wider local marketing review. Agency Pilot includes it in relevant sales and progress reporting, where it can sit beside profile, website and search observations. Keep each measure distinct: appearing in an AI answer, ranking on a map and receiving a qualified enquiry are different events. None should silently stand in for the others.

End the review with a concrete next action supported by the evidence. That might be checking a mistaken business description, improving the explanation of a real service or retaining the current query set for another scheduled observation. If the client wants to know whether assistants generated sales, review the available attribution and customer information separately. A visibility sample can start that investigation, but it cannot by itself establish traffic, lead quality, revenue or a return on the agency's fee.

Frequently asked questions

What does an AI visibility audit actually measure?

It samples responses for the selected business-related queries and records whether the business is mentioned and which alternatives appear. The result has a defined query set and observation context. It does not cover every possible conversation or user experience. Present it as a useful sample for investigation and comparison, rather than a complete measure of the business's presence across all AI systems.

How should I select the first queries to audit?

Start with the client's real services and target locations, then ask which customer decisions matter commercially. Keep the wording specific enough to understand the intended need. Avoid choosing only questions that already contain the business name if the objective is discovery among providers. Retain the exact phrases in the working plan so future comparisons do not silently change what is being measured.

Is a business mention the same as a recommendation?

No. A name may appear in several contexts, including a list, comparison or reference that does not endorse the business. Review the context before describing the result to the client. Use wording that matches the evidence and avoid implying that a mention guarantees preference, clicks or sales. Those are different claims that require different supporting observations from the customer journey.

Why might two runs produce different answers?

The existing product guidance notes that AI answers can vary between runs and users. Keep that variability visible in the report and retain the query and date with each observation. A single favorable or unfavorable answer should not become a definitive claim about the entire market. Look for patterns using a consistent method, and explain when the sample is insufficient for a confident conclusion.

Should I change my questions until the client appears?

Exploring alternative phrasing can be useful if it reflects a genuine customer question, but distinguish that exploration from the established comparison set. Selecting only favorable answers can make the report misleading. Keep the purpose and wording of each query visible, and explain what changed. The goal is to understand visibility for relevant needs, not to produce a positive screenshot at any cost.

Does the audit cover every assistant and search experience?

No. The existing feature describes ChatGPT and other available AI answers through the search data provider, with a limited set of money keywords per audit. It is not continuous monitoring of every engine or conversation. Check the actual report's sources and scope before making a coverage claim, and avoid naming an assistant as tested unless the evidence for that audit supports it.

Can I promise that content changes will get a client recommended?

No. You can commit to accurate, useful content and a clear measurement process, but not to controlling every external answer. A sampled result does not reveal all the reasons behind it. Explain the work you propose and how you will review subsequent observations, while keeping outcome expectations qualified. This lets the client evaluate the service without confusing a practical improvement with a guaranteed recommendation.

What should I do when the wrong business is mentioned?

Confirm the query, location and intended business identity, then inspect the available result context. Similar names or an overly broad question can make the comparison unclear. Record the issue and review the client's public information for accurate identity and service details. Do not assume the answer proves a defect in the client's website before verifying that the audit asked the question you intended.

How should I compare competitors named in an answer?

First verify that they serve the relevant need and location. Then review public facts that help explain how each business presents itself, keeping observation separate from speculation. A named competitor can provide a research lead, but the audit does not establish that one visible feature caused the mention. Avoid copying unsupported claims or irrelevant services merely because another business appeared in the sample.

Can the audit tell me how many customers used an assistant?

A visibility sample does not measure the total number of customers asking those questions. It records the sampled answers available to the audit. Customer activity requires separate evidence from visits, enquiries, customer conversations or other appropriate sources. Be careful not to multiply a mention by an assumed audience and present the result as verified reach or a count of potential buyers.

How do I connect AI visibility with lead reporting?

Review the available lead attribution and customer information separately from the sampled answers. If there is evidence of a relevant referral or customer-reported source, explain its scope and limitations. A business appearing in an answer does not prove that a particular enquiry came from it. Keeping the measures distinct allows the agency to explore the relationship without inventing a connection the data cannot establish.

What is a useful next step if the business is absent?

Review whether the query matches the actual service and market, then inspect the client's public information for clarity and accuracy. Identify a specific improvement the agency can justify independently, such as explaining a real service more clearly. Keep the absence as an observation with limits. It does not establish a universal problem or prove that a single page change will make the business appear.

Should I include AI visibility in every monthly report?

Include it when it is relevant to the agreed engagement and you can explain the measurement. A client focused on other urgent priorities may need a different emphasis. If included, keep the query set and scope clear and connect the result to a useful decision. Adding another metric without interpretation can make the report longer without helping the owner understand what to do next.

What should I record when updating the audit plan?

Record the changed queries, business identity details, observation dates and the reason for the adjustment in the client's working notes. Explain whether the next report continues an established series or begins a new exploration. This context is especially useful when another teammate reviews the account, preventing a change in the questions from being presented as a sudden change in visibility itself.

How can I explain uncertainty without making the report unhelpful?

State the observation clearly, identify its scope and propose the next justified action. For example, explain that a sampled answer omitted the business for a specific service query, then review whether the public service information is accurate and complete. Uncertainty does not prevent useful work. It prevents the agency from promising more than the evidence supports while still giving the client a practical direction.